A house divided against itself cannot stand.

No one's quite sure of the rationale.  I wonder if they're going to require all attending to take some kind of oath, and arrest or fire anyone who won't.

I think this is true: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-weekend-essay/why-ai-isnt-going-to-make-art

In particular, the idea of art as a series of choices is something I was thinking about recently, as opposed to life, which might be characterized as a series of responses.  Do we really choose dispassionately between options in life, or is that something that we infer when looking back on our lives?  Situations present themselves (good, bad) and w respond, sometimes well, sometimes catastrophically.

But art lies exactly in making choices, as the article describes.

There’s an article in the Guardian today about a book proposing reparations for slavery in the UK. It pointed out that such reparations need not be monetary. That got me thinking: perhaps the primary value for a reparations process is the accurate accounting of exactly what wrongs were done, and the cost of those wrongs. Often an accounting of the wrongs of the past amount to nothing more than generalized handwringing and a vague sense of guilt, but processes like the Waitangi Tribunal require detailed, specific analysis of wrongs and their ongoing consequences, which in itself constitutes a value.

www.henrikkarlsson.xyz/p/attention

With notes on how sustained attention may lead to synchronized biochemical processes that reinforce themselves.