Category Archives: Uncategorized

First-naming in politics

I’ve been talking about the inherent sexism of calling Candidate Clinton by her first name, Hillary, while using last names or full titles with the other candidates (“Trump”, “Bush”, …). Then, of course, there’s Bernie, which throws a wrench in my theory.

Ian McEwan has another theory, as evinced by his one-line throwaway in an article in the Guardian (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/09/country-political-crisis-tories-prime-minister): it’s a way to make us disenfranchised plebs more interested in the goings on of the elections.

“Our first-naming paradoxically measures our distance from events.”

Trump

I’m leery of Hitler comparisons, given the observation that political discussions on the web inevitably devolve into parallels between whatever and Nazism, and Trump reminds me more of Berlusconi, but this paragraph from a New Yorker article, http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-dangerous-acceptance-of-donald-trump?mbid=social_facebook, gave me pause:

He’s not Hitler, as his wife recently said? Well, of course he isn’t. But then Hitler wasn’t Hitler—until he was. At each step of the way, the shock was tempered by acceptance. It depended on conservatives pretending he wasn’t so bad, compared with the Communists, while at the same time the militant left decided that their real enemies were the moderate leftists, who were really indistinguishable from the Nazis. The radical progressives decided that there was no difference between the democratic left and the totalitarian right and that an explosion of institutions was exactly the most thrilling thing imaginable.

Voter ID

I remember when Republicans were vociferously against any form of national identity card in the US; it smacked of Europe in the 30/s.  But apparently the same Repulicans insist we need it now to avoid fraud at the ballot.  Am I missing something, again?

Corporations and people

This quote from BoingBoing encapsulates what I was talking with dB and Calder about back east:

“We have given rise to a race of post-human, immortal, uncaring superbeings, called transnational corporations. We humans are their gut-flora, tolerated so long as we help them get on with their metabolic processes, but treated as pathogens when we threaten their well-being.”

We Are More Rational Than Those Who Nudge Us

In https://aeon.co/essays/we-are-more-rational-than-those-who-nudge-us Steven Poole argues against the coercive anti-rational implications of the Nudge thesis.  I remember reading Sunnstein’s “Nudge” years ago, and how it opened my eyes to the possibilities of inducing rational behavior on a societal scale.  Since the book came out, as the article points out, Western governments have embraced its policy suggestions, in some cases hiring “choice architects” to create policy such that the general populace “did the right thing” by default.

Not far from here to Lessig’s “Tweed-ism” primary thesis.  In fact, we might be seeing the breakdown of this in the surging candidacies of Sanders and Trump, as described by Clay Shirky