We all shop at Trader Joe’s.  https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/tell-trader-joes-to-commit-to-keeping-ice-out

This one is for my son, Ian. Years ago before the Internet, when social media was dial-up and I had an account on the Whole Earth ‘Lectronic Link, I read a post speculating about a new theory, that ocean warming could cause a state change in the oceanic currents that keep Europe warmer than other places with similar latitudes (for example, northern Canada). Not a gradual temperature shift, but more like flipping a switch.  If such a thing happened, the average temperature in Europe would quickly plummet, making traditional agriculture as it’s currently practiced in traditional locations difficult or impossible.  This in turn would significantly affect Europe’s ability to feed itself.

The theory has become well-accepted. This week I read that the consensus is now that there’s a 50% chance that the state change will happen this century, and a substantial chance that it happens by 2050.

From a book* I’m reading, while being interrupted by the events of war in Iran driven by the US administration:

I was beginning to behave like a fatally wounded old animal that charges in all directions, bumps into every obstacle, falls and gets up, more and more furious, more and more weakened, crazed and intoxicated by the smell of its own blood.

* The Possibility of an Island, Michel Houellebecq

doc.searls.com/2026/04/13/the-kids-take-over-2/

How to empower kids in schools to really use the tools of now. AI, CNC, robotics, programming, all integrated into the curriculum instead of firewalled into a speciality class. Starting in Kindergarten, like reading.  The “coding” push in the last few years was always a dead end, focused on job skills and quickly superseded by AI.  But the approach described here is about empowerment.

Contrast this with https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/to-teach-in-the-time-of-chatgpt-is-to-know-pain/, which documents a thoroughly frustrated take on how (higher level) education is grappling with AI.  What are the institutions missing?

Bruce Sterling comes at everything sideways. Like this: “Whatever Happens to Music Will Happen to AI”. New stuff I didn’t know. Connections I hadn’t made. What a useful guy.

Just read Dave Winer’s latest on text editors he’s working on, and then, lo and behold, another feed I follow is talking about their Markdown editor.  Seems like an opportunity here for interop.

https://observatory.cooperate.social/

AI analysis of media coverage of specific domains.  In the case of the Iran war, two things jump out:

• the media being analyzed deliberately exclude the Western MSM, and
• the site generates testable predictions daily, which it then scores the next day

So I’m watching Ezra Klein interviewing Christopher Caldwell of the Claremont Institute about Trumpism.  Caldwell is describing Trumpism as being concerned with small-d democracy, bureaucracy (the Deep State), inequality (the Global Elites, the technocrats). He cites the Iran War as the point at which Trumpists throw up their hands in incredulity, having not expected this at all based on their understanding of Trump.

In science, we have theories about theories, all of which are questionable, but nevertheless … Here’s the most naive one, which most scientists themselves profess.  Scientists craft theories to fit a set of known generally-acknowledged facts.  There may be more than one competing theory. Theories are evaluated not only on how well they fit the facts, but how good their predictive powers are: can a theory predict new facts?  Is it conceivable that we can find facts that contradict the theory to the extent that we can prove it’s wrong, or at least incomplete?

There are at least two popular competing theories of Trumpism.  One is that described by Caldwell.  Another is that Trump is a classic authoritarian.  Caldwell is saying that people whom he classifies as Trumpists (Meghan Kelly, Joe Rogan, …) didn’t predict, and are surprised by, the Iran War.  On the other hand, theories of authoritarianism explicitly predict that tyrants will start wars of choice for a variety of reasons having to do with their hold on power.

There are useful things to know in Caldwell’s explanation of how and why Trump gained the power that he has gained.  But in some scientific sense, surely authoritarianism is a better explainer for Trump than Caldwell’s tortured description of Trumpism?

 With all Democratic elected officials.  But I can’t, ironically, because the author has chosen to make it non-public (specifically, not available to non-BlueSky social media users).  http://scripting.com/2026/03/26.html#a155137